Saturday, September 12, 2009
Sparring with the NAEMT Treasurer
Anyone who wants a copy of the NAEMT Treasurers Report from 2008, please contact me.
Rick Ellis has decided to ask a question. Rick is the Treasurer for NAEMT, and while I have a lot of respect for Rick, I am sorely disappointed.
Rick's Question to me on the NAEMT...Please make sure you read my follow-up response, there is very little dynamite in this, but toward the end of MY response is a shocker.
Rick Ellis:
Dan:
I would very much like to see the information you have regarding NAEMT paying for members to fly first class.
If members get an upgrade at no cost to NAEMT due to their frequent flier miles then that is something they earned and NAEMT is not being charged.
Also to let you know, if you add all travel lines in the budget (to cover instructors teaching our expo precon courses, PHTLS, AMLS, EPC committee travel, BoD travel, staff travel to support our major conference) you would be close to being correct as it accounts for 21% of the projected budget. To date we have spent only 9.8% of that budget.
As you are aware we are in the process of writing the new editions of AMLS and PHTLS textbooks. Much of this work is being done remotely but there is a need for some face to face time with publishers and authors.
If we were to look only at BoD travel, there is 7.3% of the budget projected to account for travel to meet twice a year and to attend meetings representing you the member at national forums and committees. To date we have only spent 55% of the 7.3% projected. By exerting conservative spending ideas, we only spent 50% of the projected budget item for the mid year meeting.
Travel was drastically reduced after the past Treasurer's concerns were raised in his departing report and continue to be scrutinized.
Thanks for your concern and request for information and clarification.
Richard Ellis, BSOE, NREMT-P
Treasurer
My Response to Rick:
Chief Ellis,
As previous comments have been removed because the monitors of the forum have felt that they did not conform to the guidelines here, let me advise you that my comments and yours may be edited or removed.
As per NAEMT: “The views expressed here are strictly personal and are not necessarily subscribed to by the association. Messages that harass, abuse or threaten other members; have obscene, unlawful, defamatory, libelous, hateful, or otherwise objectionable content; or have spam, commercial or advertising content or links are liable to be removed by the website administrator. We also reserve the right to edit the comments that do get published”
If you want additional information, or documentation, email me at daniel.gerard@comcast.net
To answer your question:
You stated that due to the last treasurers report, that issues relevant to travel were addressed and travel was scaled back.
What other issues in the past treasurers report were raised that you have addressed?
I am curious because previously, on this forum, another officer spoke disparagingly of that report, and now I am confused because you are stating that you have actually acted on some of those issues.
If anyone would like to see what was said previously, please email me and I will supply you a copy of what was said. My email is daniel.gerard@comcast.net
You stated Chief Ellis, and I will quote you here “I would very much like to see the information you have regarding NAEMT paying for members to fly first class.”
Sir this is very easy, as you already have them in your possession. Please refer to the Clinton Travel Agency records for the last three years, specifically the credit card receipts. Please look for the 500 Mile Upgrades purchased to be utilized for upgrades in travel.
They are all right there.
Are you also saying that we never paid for the frequent flyer club membership for any officer of the Association? NEVER?
My original question, sir, with all due respect accorded your position, I asked how much money was spent. If I wasn’t clear sir, my apologies, but I want to know a dollar amount, not what you have budgeted.
Why? You have a budget of 21%. That budgetary number is just what you have allotted, it wasn’t what you spent. You are going into the most expensive time of the year, and in past years, because the conference is in the last quarter, we have historically had a difficult time.
So that I am clear, and others understand, before we spend any other money, we have allotted 21 cents out of every dollar for travel. Out of the 79 cents left, we still have to pay salaries, benefits, of the staff in Clinton, operate and maintain the building, taxes, print and mail the newsletter, correspondence, computers, paper, and last but not least, benefits to the membership.
If we spend 21% of every dollar on travel, how much money do we spend on the members? If I am paying you my money what do I get from the Association, in dollars and as a percentage of the total budget for my dues that I paid during the last completed fiscal year?
To go back to my original question, please tell me and everyone else, what did the Association spend, in dollars and as a percentage of the total budget for travel the last 3 years?
What business was accomplished by the board of directors on this travel?
Why do I want to know this? If we are flying officers and Board members to state conferences to increase recruitment, the paid membership of the Association is between 6,000 and 7,000 members. The rest of the membership is composed of ‘free’ members who do not contribute anything in the way of dues, but have gained access for 1 year free by attending a PHTLS, AMLS, and EPC class.
Since we are not gaining a huge number of members, wouldn’t our money be better spent by keeping the officers and board of directors home, and letting local members of the Association staff the booths? This way we can kill two birds with one stone, develop local leaders, and put a real face on the organization, a member of the local EMS community who is also a member of NAEMT? What better person to explain the benefits of NAEMT than the guy or gal next door.
If the Association is growing by leaps and bounds because of the efforts of the officers of the Association, all well and good, it was worth the effort. Please provide the number of paid the members over the last 10 years (not the ‘free’ members who get their membership from AMLS, PHTLS, and EPC). Start from 1998 and show me how sending the officers to state conferences has increased membership.
I understand that travel is touchy subject, but since you brought it up Chief Ellis, have we spent any money to fly the officers or board members of the Association to a retirement affair for an officer of the Association?
I am sorry sir, regardless of how much I respect the officer in question, flying the officers and board members to retirement party is wrong. If it is wrong for AIG, Washington Mutual, and other bank executives to go to Las Vegas, it is equally as wrong to fly the officers of the Association to a retirement affair.
Our members are struggling, this isn’t responsible, it is reprehensible.
I can understand sending a couple (meaning no more than two) of the officers or members of the board for the National EMS Bike Ride. This is important for the Association and the EMS community as whole. I applaud the efforts of Jennifer for undertaking this.
I cannot and will not support flying officers to a party to have a good time on Association money, money that comes from the pockets of our members.
Previously I asked for and have yet to receive a response:
Which officers and board members traveled?
Where did they go?
What official business were they on?
How much did it cost?
Respectfully,
Daniel R. Gerard, MS, RN, NREMT-P
Communication in the New Millenium Part II
Again as I am concerned this will be removed by NAEMT, I am echoing my responses here.
Pat's response:
Patrick Moore, President 12 Sep, 04:56 PM
Dan
The FACT is that NAEMT has not and does not reimburse anyone for first-class airfare. This has been the policy for as long as I can remember and that policy is still in effect today under my administration.
My response to Pat Moore:
Sir,
I would respectfully disagree with you. But before I answer your question:
As previous comments have been removed because the monitors of the forum have felt that they did not conform to the guidelines here, let me advise you that my comments and yours may be edited or removed.
As per NAEMT: “The views expressed here are strictly personal and are not necessarily subscribed to by the association. Messages that harass, abuse or threaten other members; have obscene, unlawful, defamatory, libelous, hateful, or otherwise objectionable content; or have spam, commercial or advertising content or links are liable to be removed by the website administrator. We also reserve the right to edit the comments that do get published”
If you want additional information, or documentation, email me at daniel.gerard@comcast.net
Mr. Moore, perhaps you would want to reconsider your response when you state '...that NAEMT has not and does not reimburse anyone for first-class airfare...'
I do not know if you are familiar with the United Airlines Program the 'Red Carpet Club' or that upgrades have been activated under this program.
If you do not have the information at your disposal I would be happy to supply you or any other officer/member of the board of the Association or any member of the Association with the particular information and then you can see what I am referring to.
My best to Leslie,
Stay safe,
Daniel R. Gerard, MS, RN, NREMT-P
Friday, September 11, 2009
Communication in the New Millenium
I am also mirroring whatever I post to the NAEMT Election forum here, as I cannot be assured it is or is not being edited by NAEMT, because the 'monitor' does not like what is being written.
I do not condone their editing of my responses, and I have not gotten a satisfactory answer as what is or is not acceptable.
Don Walsh posted a question:
Dear NAEMT Candidate:
I would like your views on how will you reach and support your NAEMT members in good standing if elected.
Respectfully,
Don Walsh
NAEMT Member
My response, unedited, to Don Walsh:
Don,
As previous comments have been removed because the monitors of the forum have felt that they did not conform to the guidelines here, let me advise you that my comments and yours may be edited or removed.
As per NAEMT: “The views expressed here are strictly personal and are not necessarily subscribed to by the association. Messages that harass, abuse or threaten other members; have obscene, unlawful, defamatory, libelous, hateful, or otherwise objectionable content; or have spam, commercial or advertising content or links are liable to be removed by the website administrator. We also reserve the right to edit the comments that do get published”
If you want additional information, or documentation, email me at daniel.gerard@comcast.net
To answer your question:
To reach the members I will leverage resources such as Youtube and Facebook.
For example, NAEMT spent money on a poster campaign to reduce occupational motor vehicle injuries. While it was an honest attempt to reduce injuries, NAEMT nor any other organization collects EMS occupational injury rates, so making an honest evaluation on how the poster reduced injuries, is impossible. Honestly, are posters really the best way to get information to the membership?
EMT’s and paramedics Tweet, watch YouTube, have Facebook and MySpace pages. They text message one another. They email and surf the net at least once a day. The best PSA of the year was done by an EMS agency in Scotland, which was then posted on YouTube and has gone viral around the world ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6biw3LEq_0c )
NAEMT sent out a poster to remind people to buckle up. I disagree with this. This is a difference of opinion, but one that is telling. I feel, in my personal opinion, that this was not NAEMT’s best effort and we owe it to EMT’s and Paramedics to do more, to reach them using forms of media that a broad base of the population is comfortable with.
In regards to supporting the membership, It is our duty to support the membership, and I take this duty seriously. I have worked in EMS in a government configuration for most of my adult life. I have taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, and as such, when I see something wrong, regardless of where it is, I am duty bound to stand-up and do the right thing.
I will stand up for the membership of NAEMT.
As an example, 25% of the budget for NAEMT is spent on travel. I feel that this is wasteful and does not benefit the membership. The outgoing treasurer wrote a report on the finances of the Association, and this was one topic that was brought up (please email me at daniel.gerard@comcast.net for your own copy of this report)
I do not think, in my personal opinion, that it is appropriate that that much money is spent on travel. It is more economical to teleconference. I am in a large county in California. I am 10 to 30 minutes from any of my colleagues. We meet frequently on a variety of issues, but we do most of our meetings via teleconference.
I would want to know how much money was spent on travel, by officer, who got upgrades, and who flew first class. I do not feel this is unreasonable for the members to know. We pay dues, we pay to attend classes, we have rights as members of the Association.
Now the Officers of the Association and the Board of Directors differ with me on this. I do not feel that it is appropriate that officers of the Association fly first class, or get club upgrades/memberships. I do not feel that members of the board or officers should be silent on this issue. Again, this is a difference of opinion, nothing more.
Members of the Association have rights. The Officers and the Board of Directors have a responsibility to be prudent with our members money. Our members work hard. Some are struggling, to pay mortgages and to hold onto jobs. We owe them. Again, I will point out this is a difference of opinion on travel.
I want to know how much money was spent on travel, by officer, who got upgrades, and who flew first class. I do not feel this is unreasonable for the members to know. We pay dues, we pay to attend classes, we have rights as members of the Association.
If some Officers or members of the Board of Directors turn a blind eye to this practice, or accept it as fact, I am disappointed that they have done so. I feel this is wrong
I will respect the rights of the members and I intend to honor the membership by protecting those rights and being responsible with their money.
As another example, the current, proposed by-laws change, I feel does not serve the best interests of the membership. NAEMT has always been a breeding ground for leaders in our field. This by-laws change limits opportunities for people to progress in the organization.
Let me note, the by-laws change does not affect me one bit, nor does it affect my opponent. I go to the conference every year, and I pay my own way. I am also an instructor in all of the disciplines of the Association. I have served on various committees for the Association. When I say I disagree with the by-laws change, I am speaking in advice for the membership.
It seems to me, in my personal opinion, that the only people who will benefit from the new by-laws is the status quo.
I would want to hear what the attorney for NAEMT says in regards to the by-laws, and I would want to have the opportunity to view any correspondence in regards to this. If elected, I would want the membership to have the opportunity to view the correspondence, as well as any pro or con statements in support of the by-laws. Please correct me if I am wrong, but except for statements from some of the officers supporting the by-laws change, there were no opposing statements provided, nor was any correspondence provided to the membership between the Board of Directors and the attorney for NAEMT.
It is the right of the membership to view that correspondence, they pay for the attorney through their dues and classes.
If you would like more information, please email me directly at:
daniel.gerard@comcast.net
Respectfully submitted,
Daniel R. Gerard
Monday, August 31, 2009
Yes it is that time again...
My name is Daniel R. Gerard, MS, RN, NREMT-P, and I am running for the NAEMT Region IV Director.
I started as a volunteer EMT in
I have over 27 years in the field, mostly in the urban environment, working in Newark, NJ, Jersey City, NJ, Bergen County, NJ and Alameda County, CA.
NAEMT is a member driven organization. As a member of NAEMT I have consistently dedicated myself to the Association and the membership.
I am not running to advance my resume, to get a new job, to make money from our vendors, or to get free travel. I am running because I believe in who we are and what we do. I believe that we deserve better. I believe that as a profession we deserve equal consideration with other healthcare and public safety professions.
I seek this position with no illusions.
Every one deserves to have a safe environment to work in. Let me ask you question:
Ask the police and fire services and they can give you a number.
Ask NAEMT and no one knows. How do we begin to address the problems associated with occupational injuries and deaths when we don’t know where to start? How do we know we are on the right track if we cannot measure our success?
NAEMT has let us down in this endeavor.
While I was the Chairman of the Paramedic Division, I authored two reports on occupational injuries in
Seven years later these recommendations have yet to be acted upon. If elected to the Board, I will make it my priority to address this critical issue.
EMS deserve's our own voice in
There are multiple agencies that have this responsibility in the federal government, and they all sit on the Federal Interagency Committee on EMS (FICEMS).
Yet none of these programs have budgetary authority and none of them may hire or fire personnel. They have the capability to write reports, but as of yet, in the entire history of the federal government and FICEMS, the federal government has NEVER acted on a FICEMS recommendation.
I have always been an advocate for a separate federal
Since that time, look at the situation that
If you look to the fire service they have been very active, establishing a
Law enforcement has the Department of Justice, with a national academy run by the FBI in
EMS STILL has nothing remotely comparable on the federal level. I am a member of NAEMT and I want to know WHY?
WHY doesn’t NAEMT support a SINGLE federal agency, with a national academy for
I will make it my mission to have NAEMT support the IOM’s recommendation, issuing a position statement supporting a federal agency. The membership overwhelming supports a federal agency, I support a federal agency, EMT’s and paramedics nationwide deserve a federal agency, funded and staffed to be equal with the police and fire services.
Let me ask you one more question: Do you work hard for your money? Do YOU WORK HARD for the MONEY that YOU MAKE to PAY your DUES to NAEMT?
How much money does NAEMT spend on travel? What is the result of the travel that the leaders of NAEMT have engaged in? What happened to the financial audit that the membership was told was going to take place? What happens with OUR money? Don’t we deserve to know? Where is the accountability?
If we don’t have a safer work environment and we do not have a federal agency representing our interests, what is going on?
Have you seen the by-laws changes proposed by the Association?
The new by-laws changes will restrict the opportunity for members to run fun for office, essentially limiting the opportunity for people to run, unless they have been selected by the President of NAEMT. Even the ATTORNEY for NAEMT said that the new by-laws change was a bad move.
Where is that letter from the attorney for NAEMT and what does it say?
So with unrestricted travel, no accountability for finances, and restricting who can run or who cannot run for office, how do you the DUES PAYING MEMBER benefit?
This is just an opportunity for people to use your hard earned money, without question, to support their own activities.
This is wrong. I will hold the organization accountable to the dues paying members, and I will do everything in my power to over turn the latest by-laws change that the Board of NAEMT is seeking.
Who stands up for you, the dues paying member? Who represents you and your interests and who want’s to do the right thing for YOU?
WHO?
NAEMT is not an organization that benefits a select few at the expense of the many. It is a MEMBER organization, representing men and women, built on their personal and professional sacrifice. There is no easy way to success, and we shouldn’t exclude our brothers and sisters from seeking office to benefit a select few. In all of my time in
NAEMT has a DUTY to the membership. I have a duty to the membership. Stand TOGETHER with ME, TOGETHER vote for ME, and TOGETHER WE will carry the
Thursday, September 11, 2008
A true story
As part of the EMS honor guard I had done line of duty death services for many of our own in the NY, NJ, and PA area. Every-time we went to ceremony, I always felt terribly guilty, because afterward I said "It wasn't me...it wasn't anyone I knew..."
My response was never like the scene from "Full-Metal Jacket", where the Marines are standing around one of their own, and the view is from the deceased's perspective...
One guy says "Go easy Cowboy", and they go around from one to the next, another guy says, "Semper Fi" until they finally get to a guy called Animal, and he says "Better you than me"...
I was never like that! While people wanted to talk about how our long loved brother or sister had lived their life, or if they were injured, the great times they USED to have, I wanted to find out the who, the what, the why...
Why did they have to die or get hurt...
Was there a better piece of equipment to use...
Could we have done a better job designing equipment for them to do their job...
Was there a safer ambulance...
Were there better radios/methods of communications...
Was there a better way we could train or prepare people for work...
Better procedures...
Because I didn't want it to happen AGAIN. I admit this is always painful, but I wanted to KNOW.
One young man in particular, stands out, his story will always live with me. We had sent our honor guard over from UMDNJ for his funeral. Units came from all over, as far north as Boston and as far south as Washington, D.C. This young man was an EMT who was killed while loading a patient into the back of his ambulance.
He was struck and killed by a drunk driver who drove into the back of his EMS unit, killing him and critically injuring his partner. I don't know if he even knew what happened, but I do know one thing, he was at his most vulnerable, he couldn't even throw his hands up to protect himself because he was holding on to the stretcher. He wasn't going to let his patient fall, he never left her side.
I wanted to ask someone "Was there anything that could have been done to protect them..." but somebody else asked the question. Nobody knew the answer.
Now I know that you will say "well just keep drunks off the road...there was nothing you could do..." but what if there was?
Was there? When I became Chairman of the National Paramedic Division and I started to ask questions, the one thing I found out, there was little data and even less research on how or why we are injured in the line of duty.
Every-time someone was injured, every-time someone died, I heard the same thing..."Never again"or "lets learn from this one boys..." .
But how? We didn't share information, we didn't have any data to develop meaningful injury prevention programs. If we had good data, GOOD INFORMATION, we could then begin to incorporate this information into EMT and paramedic classes, into training programs for CPR, ACLS, PHTLS, perhaps even preventing someone from dying in the line of duty or suffering a career ending injury.
Then I heard about Nadine Levick, who was talking about ambulance crashes and how we should make our vehicles safer...I had good friends who were doing the beginnings of EMS injury research say "...we really don't understand the MAGNITUDE of this problem..."
Why wasn't anyone else paying attention to what these people were doing?
It still begged the question: Without data, without information, how do we develop meaningful injury prevention programs? How do we stop repeating the cycle of injury, disability, and death?
There were so many things we didn't know and and we needed to learn, from wellness-fitness programs for EMS providers, to how to respond to terrorist incidents, how Mercedes Benz crash tests ambulance. So many different ways to protect us. Were any of them fool-proof?
No, but it was better than what I knew, which was nothing.
It just made me ask:
If we had better ambulances and better driver training, would deaths in emergency motor vehicle collisions decline?
If we had wellness-fitness programs and better training would we have less back injuries?
If we had better procedures and training, such as what you see in Israel, could the injuries suffered by the police in the abortion clinic bombing in Sandy Springs in 1997, have been avoided?
I knew in my heart what the answers were, but did anyone else?
While I knew quite a few people who had suffered line of duty injuries, I never lost a partner. I had known cops and firemen who had died and it was always a terrible loss. It was from other peoples tragedy and loss that I became motivated to try and find out what I could about EMS occupational injuries. I wrote the first occupational injury report, and it was at this point I knew what I didn't know! Yet there has to be a better way I thought.
Still every-time someone died, it was never anybody I had been partnered with. I asked every night I went out on the street, "Please let me and my friends come home tomorrow..." It wasn't until I lost someone close to me that the mantra "Never again" took on whole new meaning...
At 9 pm on September 11 I spoke your name. I was afraid to ask, but I had to know. We were organizing the volunteer squads for stand-by at Rutgers University in Newark. They had too many people down at Liberty State Park. I had waited too long to ask about you, but now I was at the point I had to know, I had to ask because I couldn't concentrate on what I was doing.
In a small voice I said "did anyone hear from Dave or Bobby?"
Mario Piumelli said to me "Bobby called his wife and told her he was OK...nobody has heard from Dave..."
I took a deep breath...Dave Lemagne was my relief for 5 years...a happy guy with an infectious smile, I said a soft prayer and hoped for the best. Maybe he would turn up at a hospital somewhere. Police officers from NYPD had turned up at a slew of hospitals in NJ, I hoped Dave would show up somewhere.
I was too scared to ask about anybody else.
The next day on September 12 I talk with Bill C. I said to him whats up, and I should have been suspicious, because Gene O turns his head away when I ask this question. Gene can't hide his emotions very well.
Bill tells me "they found Bobby's radio-car..."
I don't comprehend this because I say, "ya, but Bobby's ok, he called his wife..."
Mario, who s standing next to me, jolts me back to reality "Danny, he called his wife before he went inside...nobody has heard from him since..."
I went numb.
On September 26, I BEG to bring personnel over to NYC. It is the last day NJ will have resources on scene at the World Trade Center. On the ride over it is very quiet. Gene O looks over and asks me, 'are you ok?'
"Ya I 'm good"
I go inside with Gene and he introduces me to several people from FDNY EMS he has been working with. I make an excuse to go outside. I walk to the fence and I stand looking. Words escape me as I look around. This is the one time in my life I don’t know what to do or say. Overwhelmed by the magnitude of this event, it is one thing to see it on the news, it is another to stand here and look. I still cannot comprehend the what, the how, or the why. This is one time I cannot bear to ask, "what could we have done better to protect our own"...I step forward, staring into the faces coming off the pile, and I wonder 'will I see you...', but like specters, they come toward me, appearing, but you aren’t there…still I hope, maybe you will appear...

A Paramedics Tale
After I became certified as a paramedic I had the opportunity to work with Bob in Jersey City and again later on when Bob worked per diem in Newark, NJ. When I was promoted to Supervisor/Chief in Jersey City, Bob gave me my rank insignia for my collar. He then took me out after work for a beer to Jules Tavern in Jersey City to celebrate. We always had a good time, and not only at work either. It could be running over to Manhattan for some late night Chinese food at Wo Hop, going for dinner at Laicos in Jersey City or bar hopping in Hoboken, we always had fun.
I remember when Bob got hired by the police department. He loved that job! I remember talking to Steve Velasquez, who reminded me of a story when Cirri graduated from the Police Academy. Bobby was going around showing everyone his badge, and honestly it was impressive. Billy Newby had a badge in his drawer that said "Pussy Inspector", for people who needed to inspect young cats, that was essentially the same size and shape as Bobby's police badge...I couldn't resist, I swapped badges when Bobby wasn't paying attention and handed it back to him. He kept showing it around for about an hour or so before somebody pointed it out to him.Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Hello

I was a Tour Chief for Jersey City Medical Center and later on I was the EMS Director for the Saint Barnabas Health Care System. My activities in NAEMT include: Immediate Past Chairman National Paramedic Division/NAEMT – I authored the very first report to NAEMT on EMT and Paramedic Occupational Injuries in 2000 with a follow-up report in 2001, I was the NAEMT representative to CAAHEP and to CECBEMS, I also served on the NAEMT Committee for the development of the first AMLS program.
I have worked as a consultant to the Pan American Health Organization and Bahamian Ministry of Health on EMS. I was also lead consultant to the Hong Kong Fire Services Department on the Paramedic Ambulance Service Re-Design.
I am currently the EMS Coordinator for the City of Alameda Fire Department (Alameda, CA) and the Treasurer of the San Francisco Paramedic Association. I was featured in the book "Into the Breach" by Jana Abrams-Karam.
What I believe
We need to be engaged, as engaged as our brothers and sisters in the police and fire services. Only through an active membership and leadership will we accomplish great things for the EMS community.
EMS Occupational Health
What do we need to do?
NAEMT must sponsor a national occupational injury summit during our national meeting. I would seek to bring the various stakeholders in EMS and occupational health together, to develop an agenda and work plan for reducing occupational injuries in EMS. We also need to recognize EMS organizations that are working strides in reducing occupational injuries. We must provide this information on those successful programs to all EMT’s and paramedics.
NAEMT must also approach Congress to give us the tools we need to protect EMT's and paramedics and to gather data so that we may begin to understand the scope of the occupational health problem in our profession. Only then can we begin to develop curriculum for health, safety, and well-being of EMS personnel everywhere.
We owe this to our profession.
NHTSA houses the only home for EMS in the federal government. Go to the NHTSA website ( http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/ ). Where does it mention EMS?
In 2008 the federal EMS Office in NHTSA was funded for two million dollars, with a staff of 11. In Alameda County California, the County EMS Office is funded to over 25 million dollars with a staff of 35. In 2005 EMS received only 4 percent of the federal funding for first responders. In the last federal budget and trauma programs received zero dollars.
We need to do this better!
Then, with the power to hire and fire, to control budgets, to provide grants and assistance, will EMS even BEGIN to have the recognition we desperately deserve.
NAEMT has to do better!
We need to approach this issue by working collaboratively, we need to listen to the needs of the membership and we need to listen to learned bodies such as the Institute of Medicine. I want an Association that is going to take my needs and the needs of my brother and sister EMT's and paramedics seriously. An Association that is responsive to the needs of its members and that is willing to work for its members.
My name is Dan Gerard and I want a chance to do better for you and the Association. Please cast your vote for me as Director at Large.
Thank you,
Dan
